Safety Analysis and Seismic Behavior of Concrete Arch Dams (V&U-shaped Dams)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of civil engineering, Islamic Azad University, Iran

2 Assistant professor, Department of civil engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran

Abstract

Investigation of seismic safety evaluation of concrete dams has been the focus of many researchers due to the importance of dam safety during an earthquake. Because the destruction of these structures due to an earthquake can have negative economic and social effects. In the present study, the nonlinear dynamic analysis of gravity concrete dams has been done considering the effect of dam-reservoir interaction. In fact, the minimum and maximum principal stresses of the U-shaped dam and reservoir have been measured via ANSYS. The results show that the static analysis with non-linear behavior in the rock mass with medium and weak layers has more stability compared to the weak homogeneous system. But it is more possible to concentrate plastic strains in weak layers. Other results of this study showed that the compressive stresses in the safety check of the dam were not critical and the maximum tensile arc stresses were obtained mainly in the upper levels of the middle blocks.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Copyright © 2023 Noureddin Sadeghi. This is an open access paper distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application is published by Pendar Pub; Journal p-ISSN 2676-332X; Journal e-ISSN 2588-2880.

[1] Alegre A, Oliveira S, Mendes P, Proença J, Ramos R, Carvalho E. Seismic Safety Assessment of Arch Dams Using an ETA-Based Method with Control of Tensile and Compressive Damage. Water. 2022 Nov 25;14(23):3835. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[2] National Research Council. Earthquake engineering for concrete dams: design, performance, and research needs. National Academies Press; 1991 Feb 1. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[3] EM-1110-2-1612: Ice Engineering, U. S. Army Corps of Engineering (USACE), Washington D.C., 1996. [View at Publisher].
[4] Dams L, ENROCHEMENT BE, BITUMINEUX AM. International Commission on Large Dams. Sydney, Australia. 1999 Mar.View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[5] EM-1110-2-2201: Arch Dam Design, U. S. Army Corps of Engineering (USACE), Washington D.C., 1994. [View at Publisher].
[6] Li Z, Wu Z, Lu X, Zhou J, Chen J, Liu L, Pei L. Efficient seismic risk analysis of gravity dams via screening of intensity measures and simulated non-parametric fragility curves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2022 Jan 1;152:107040. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[7] Kupfer HB, Gerstle KH. Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. Journal of the engineering mechanics division. 1973 Aug;99(4):853-66. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[8] Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL. The finite element method: solid mechanics. Butterworth-heinemann; 2000. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[9] Gravity Dams, (Design Standards No.2), U. S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), U.S. Department of Interior, Denver, CO., 1966. [View at Publisher].
[10] Alembagheri M, Ghaemian M. Seismic assessment of concrete gravity dams using capacity estimation and damage indexes. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 2013 Jan;42(1):123-44. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[11] Wang G, Wang Y, Lu W, Yu M, Wang C. Deterministic 3D seismic damage analysis of Guandi concrete gravity dam: A case study. Engineering Structures. 2017 Oct 1;148:263-76. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[12] Chopra AK, Chakrabarti P. Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including dam‐water‐foundation rock interaction. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics. 1981;9(4):363-83. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[13] Fenves G, Chopra AK. Effects of reservoir bottom absorption on earthquake response of concrete gravity dams. Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics. 1983 Nov;11(6):809-29. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[14] Nourouzi F, Kalateh F, Lotfollahi-Yaghin MA. Numerical Analysis of Dynamic Response of Concrete Gravity Dam under Blast Loading in the Reservoir. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 2017 May 22;47(86):91-104. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[15] SOURI A, MIRZABOZORG H. Investigating Effects Of Stress-Dependent Material Damping On The Nonlinear Seismic Response Of A Typical Concrete Gravity Dam. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[16] Pasbani Khiavi M, Ghorbani MA, Ghaed Rahmati A. Investigation of the Effect of Near and Far Fault Earthquake on Seismic Response of Controlled Concrete Gravity Dams with Rubber Damper. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering. 2022 Apr 21;9(2):215-29. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[17] Westergaard HM. Water pressures on dams during earthquakes. Transactions of the American society of Civil Engineers. 1933 Jan;98(2):418-33. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[18] EM 1110-2-6051: Time-History Dynamic Analysis of Concrete Hydraulic Structures”, U. S. Army Corps of Engineering (USACE), Washington D.C, 2018. [View at Publisher].
[19] Chopra AK. Earthquake response analysis of concrete dams. InAdvanced dam engineering for design, construction, and rehabilitation 1988 (pp. 416-465). Boston, MA: Springer US. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[20] Hariri Ardebili, M.A. & Mirzabozorg, H. “Crack detection in seismic analysis of concrete arch dams using Endurance Time method”, accepted to 9th International congress on advances in civil engineering, Trabzon, Turkey, 2010.
[21] Emamjome, H., & Estekanchi, H.E.“Estimation of incremental dynamic analysis results using Endurance Time method”, 5th international congress in seismology and earthquake engineering, Tehran, Iran, 2007.