Effect of Using Different Fibers on Slab on Grades

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch, Khouzestan, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Masjed-Soleyman Branch, Khouzestan, Iran.

Abstract

Slab on grade, also called floors on ground, are different from other structural members. First, they are supported directly by soil, and their success or failure may depend more on the soil qualities than on the slab construction. Second, they carry equipment and floor finishes, and any defect in the slab's integrity or moisture resistance affects those elements. A floor slab undergoing drying shrinkage may not only crack, but also break the brittle ceramic tile it carries. Failure may also occur due to overloading. For reducing cracks propagation, control or contraction joints are used. In this research, 225 specimens by fifteen mix design with different dosage of polypropylene and steel fibers were prepared for evaluating compressive, impact and flexural testing at the ages of 7 and 28 days. As a result, optimum dosage of polypropylene fibers was 1.6 kg/m3 and at this dosage, impact resistance enhanced about 460% and flexural strength enhanced about 70% in comparison with control specimens. Steel fibers improved impact resistance and flexural strength about 312% and 58% respectively at the dosage of 30 kg/m3. Results also showed that compressive strengths of specimens are not significantly increased by using fibers.

Keywords


1. CANFIELD S, CN NO. Tag Archives: concrete slab construction. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

2. Neal FR. Concrete industrial ground floors. Thomas Telford; 2002. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

3. Asdrubali F. Survey on the acoustical properties of new sustainable materials for noise control. InProceedings of Euronoise 2006 May 30 (Vol. 30, pp. 1-10). Tampere: European Acoustics Association. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

4. Li Z, Leung C, Xi Y. Structural renovation in concrete. CRC Press; 2009 Feb 3. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 5. Johnson RP. Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete: beams, slabs, columns and frames for buildings. John Wiley & Sons; 2018 Nov 12. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 6. Lee YL, Lim JH, Lim SK, Tan CS. Flexural behaviour of reinforced lightweight foamed mortar beams and slabs. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2018 Aug 1;22(8):2880-9. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 7. Naseri F, Jafari F, Mohseni E, Tang W, Feizbakhsh A, Khatibinia M. Experimental observations and SVM-based prediction of properties of polypropylene fibres reinforced self-compacting composites incorporating nano-CuO. Construction and Building Materials. 2017 Jul 15;143:589-98. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 8. Suksawang N, Mirmiran A, Yohannes D. Use of fiber reinforced concrete for concrete pavement slab replacement. Florida. Dept. of Transportation. Research Center; 2014 Mar 1. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 9. Gharehbaghi K, Chenery R. Fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) for high rise construction: Case studies. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2017 Dec (Vol. 272, No. 1, p. 012034). IOP Publishing. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 10. Shanthini D. Fibre Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete–A Review. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 11. Arunakanthi E, Kumar JC. Experimental studies on fiber reinforced concrete (FRC). International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 2016;7(5):329-36. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

12. Foti D. Preliminary analysis of concrete reinforced with waste bottles PET fibers. Construction and building materials. 2011 Apr 1;25(4):1906-15. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 13. Guglielmetti V, Grasso P, Mahtab A, Xu S. Mechanized tunnelling in urban areas: design methodology and construction control. CRC Press; 2008 Jan 7. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 14. De Belie N, Soutsos M, Gruyaert E. Properties of Fresh and Hardened Concrete Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Springer; 2018. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 15. Vats G, Kuhar P, Kumar S. Mechanical Behaviour of Cement Concrete using Fibres. Int. J. of Multidisciplinary and Current research. 2018 Jul;6. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 16. Nanda RP, Behera B, Majumder S, Khan HA. RC Beam Strengthening by Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 17. Santana M, De Albuquerque MD, Isique WD, Pereira TP, Gonçalves AC, Junior EF, Costa CN. Behavior of Concrete and Mortar in Response to the Inclusion of Toxic Jatropha Seed Cake. BioResources. 2018 Jan 30;13(1):1993-2004. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 18. Al Rikabi FT, Sargand SM, Khoury I, Hussein HH. Material properties of synthetic fiber–reinforced concrete under freeze-thaw conditions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2018 Mar 28;30(6):04018090. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 19. Ma Q, Yang Y, Xiao H, Xing W. Studying Shear Performance of Flax Fiber-Reinforced Clay by Triaxial Test. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2018;2018. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher].

 20. Banthia N, inventor; Banthia Consulting Services Ltd, assignee. Polymer Fibers For Reinforcement Of Cement-Based Composites. United States patent application US 16/069,879. 2019 Apr 25. [View at Google Scholar]