Properties of Calcined Clay and Limestone Powder Blended Bio-Self Compacting Concrete

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

Abstract

Self-Compacting Concrete is a revolutionary concrete that has taken Europe, the America and Asia by storm following its development by Prof. Okamura’s research team in the late 20th century. Since then, it has been revolutionized into various improved forms either by tinkering with the constituents and mix design towards perfecting it or by use of locally available secondary cementitious materials and fillers that are ecofriendly and economical, thereby reducing the carbon footprint as well as enhancing its properties. This research looks into the possibility of using Microbial Induced Calcite Precipitation on the engineering properties of calcined clay and Limestone powder blended ternary Self-Compacting Concrete, with emphasis on the evaluation of the fresh state properties as well as strength and durability. Calcined clay was used as Supplementary Cementitious Material at 15% replacement of cement and Limestone powder as filler, with Sporosarcina Pasteurii as MICP bacteria at different bacterial cell densities of 1.5x108cfu/ml, 1.2x109cfu/ml, and 2.4x109cfu/ml, (McFarland turbidity scale of 0.5, 4.0 and 8.0 respectively) and calcium lactate (nutrient) concentration of 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% by weight of cement incorporated into the ternary blend. The strength is evaluated using compressive strength (at 7, 28 and 56 days curing) and split tensile strength (at 7 and 28 days) while the durability characteristics are evaluated using water absorption (7, 28 and 56 days) and sorptivity (7, 28 and 56 days) and the microstructure investigated using Standard electronic microscopy. The result indicates an overall improvement in the properties of the Self-compacting concrete.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Copyright © 2022 to Kumator J. Taku. This is an open access paper distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application is published by Pendar Pub; Journal p-ISSN 2676-332X; Journal e-ISSN 2588-2880.

 

 

[1] Okamura H, Ouchi M. Self-compacting concrete. Journal of advanced concrete technology. 2003;1(1):5-15. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[2] Domone PL. Self-compacting concrete: An analysis of 11 years of case studies. Cement and concrete composites. 2006 Feb 1;28(2):197-208. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[3] Agarwal G, Kadam R. Bacterial concrete-a solution to crack formation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering. 2017;4(10):1-6. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[4] Kumar RD. Self-compacted concrete mix design and its comparison with conventional concrete (M-40). Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering. 2015 Jan 1;5(3):1. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[5] Abo Dhaheer MS, Al-Rubaye MM, Alyhya WS, Karihaloo BL, Kulasegaram S. Proportioning of self–compacting concrete mixes based on target plastic viscosity and compressive strength: part I-mix design procedure. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 2016 Jul 3;5(4):199-216. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[6] Geiker M, Jacobsen S. Self-compacting concrete (SCC). InDevelopments in the Formulation and Reinforcement of Concrete 2019 Jan 1 (pp. 229-256). Woodhead Publishing. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[7] Wang T, San Nicolas R, Kashani A, Ngo T. Sustainable utilisation of low-grade and contaminated waste glass fines as a partial sand replacement in structural concrete. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022 Jun 1;16:e00794. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[8] Arularasi V, Thamilselvi P, Avudaiappan S, Saavedra Flores EI. Energy consumption of self-compacting concrete during mixing and its impact on the yield stress measured in the ready-mix concrete plant. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2021 Mar 26;2021:1-5. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[9] Hussien AS, Mohammed MK. Optimum characteristics of plastic fibres for sustainable self-compacting concrete SCC. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering. 2023 Jul 4;27(9):2967-84. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[10] Yatnikasari S, Damaiyanti M, Azzahra R. Effect of Additional Fiberglass Fiber on Concrete Performance. InAnnales de Chimie Science des Materiaux 2019 Oct 1 (Vol. 43, No. 5). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[11] De Belie N. Application of bacteria in concrete: a critical evaluation of the current status. RILEM Technical Letters. 2016;1:56-61. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[12] Vahabi A, Noghabi KA, Ramezanianpour AA. Application of Biotechnology-Based Method for Ehancing Concrete Properties. Journal of Medical and Bioengineering (JOMB) Vol. 2012 Sep;1(1). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[13] Irwan JM, Anneza LH, Othman N, Alshalif AF, Zamer MM, Teddy T. Calcium Lactate addition in Bioconcrete: Effect on Compressive strength and Water penetration. InMATEC Web of Conferences 2016 (Vol. 78, p. 01027). EDP Sciences. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[14] Ramachandran SK, Ramakrishnan V, Bang SS. Remediation of concrete using microorganisms. Materials Journal. 2001 Jan 1;98(1):3-9. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[15] Thakur A, Phogat A, Singh K. Bacterial concrete and effect of different bacteria on the strength and water absorption characteristics of concrete: a review. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 2016 Sep;7(5):43-56. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[16] De Muynck W, Boon N, De Belie N. From lab scale to in situ applications: the ascent of a biogenic carbonate based surface treatment. InXIII International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Components (XIII DBMC) 2014 (pp. 728-735). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[17] Erşan YÇ, Verbruggen H, De Graeve I, Verstraete W, De Belie N, Boon N. Nitrate reducing CaCO3 precipitating bacteria survive in mortar and inhibit steel corrosion. Cement and Concrete Research. 2016 May 1;83:19-30. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[18] Luhar S, Gourav S. A review paper on self healing concrete. J. Civ. Eng. Res. 2015;5(3):53-8. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[19] Gandhimathi A, Suji D, Elayarajah B. Bacterial concrete: Development of concrete to increase the compressive and split-tensile strength using bacillus sphaericus. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2015;10(3):7125-32. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[20] Anand K, Goyal S, Reddy MS. Long-term viable SF immobilized bacterial cells as sustainable solution for crack healing in concrete. InStructures 2022 Sep 1 (Vol. 43, pp. 1342-1355). Elsevier. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[21] Sharma TK, Alazhari M, Heath A, Paine K, Cooper RM. Alkaliphilic Bacillus species show potential application in concrete crack repair by virtue of rapid spore production and germination then extracellular calcite formation. Journal of applied microbiology. 2017 May 1;122(5):1233-44. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[22] Dinesh S, Shanmugapriyan R, Sheen SN. A review on bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2017;3(1):2454-1362. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[23] Asim M, Mughal TL, Cheema S, Tahir M, Mughal S, Mahmood A, Kanwal H, Noshin S, Ahsan M, Akram U, Sultan A. Influence of Crack Width on Healing Performance and Mechanical Properties of Micro-Organisms Based Self Healing Concrete. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences. 2022 Dec 1;12(2). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[24] Ameri, F., Shoaei, P., Bahrami, N., Vaezi, M., Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2019): Optimal Rice Husk Ash Content and Bacterial Concentration in Self-Compacting Concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 222 (2019): 796-813
[25] Concrete SC. The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete. BIBM, et al. 2005 May;22:563. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[26] Al-Rubaye MM. Self-compacting concrete: Design, properties and simulation of the flow characteristics in the L-box (Doctoral dissertation, Cardiff University). (2016). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[27] Raman V, Philip N, Baven N. The Self-Healing Effect on Bacteria-Enriched Steel Fiber-Reinforced SCC. Ingeniería e Investigación. 2022 Aug;42(2). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[28] Siddique R, Jameel A, Singh M, Barnat-Hunek D, Aït-Mokhtar A, Belarbi R, Rajor A. Effect of bacteria on strength, permeation characteristics and micro-structure of silica fume concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2017 Jul 1;142:92-100. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[29] Adeboje AO, Kupolati WK, Sadiku ER, Ndambuki JM, Kambole C. Experimental investigation of modified bentonite clay-crumb rubber concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2020 Feb 10;233:117187. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[30] Soharu A, BP N, Sil A. Fly ash bricks development using concrete waste debris and self-healing bacteria. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2022 May;24(3):1037-46. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[31] Taku JK, Amartey YD, Ejeh SP, Lawan A. Durability evaluation of calcined clay and limestone powder blended ternary self-compacting concrete. (2021) 103-113. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[32] Riad IM, Elshami AA, Elshikh MM. Influence of concentration and proportion prepared bacteria on properties of self-healing concrete in sulfate environment. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions. 2022 Feb;7:1-6. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[33] Abo Sabah SH, Anneza LH, Juki MI, Alabduljabbar H, Othman N, Al-Gheethi AA, Al-Shalif AF. The use of calcium lactate to enhance the durability and engineering properties of bioconcrete. Sustainability. 2021 Aug 18;13(16):9269. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[34] Mondal S, Ghosh AD. Investigation into the optimal bacterial concentration for compressive strength enhancement of microbial concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2018 Sep 20;183:202-14. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[35] Talbot R, Granek E, Chang H, Wood R, Brander S. Spatial and temporal variations of microplastic concentrations in Portland's freshwater ecosystems. Science of The Total Environment. 2022 Aug 10;833:155143. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[36] Vaezi M, Zareei SA, Jahadi M. Recycled microbial mortar: Effects of bacterial concentration and calcium lactate content. Construction and Building Materials. 2020 Feb 20;234:117349. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[37] Kaur P, Singh V, Arora A. Microbial concrete—a sustainable solution for concrete construction. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2022 Mar;194(3):1401-16. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[38] Pereira De Oliveira LA, de Castro Gomes JP, Gonilho Pereira CN. STUDY OF SORPTIVITY OF SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE WITH MINERAL ADDITIVES. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2006 Sep 1;12(3). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[39] Dhandapani Y, Vignesh K, Raja T, Santhanam M. Development of the microstructure in LC 3 systems and its effect on concrete properties. InCalcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Calcined Clays for Sustainable Concrete 2018 (pp. 131-140). Springer Netherlands. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[40] Karatas M, Benli A, Arslan F. The effects of kaolin and calcined kaolin on the durability and mechanical properties of self-compacting mortars subjected to high temperatures. Construction and Building Materials. 2020 Dec 30;265:120300. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[41] Chahal N, Siddique R, Rajor A. Influence of bacteria on the compressive strength, water absorption and rapid chloride permeability of concrete incorporating silica fume. Construction and Building Materials. 2012 Dec 1;37:645-51. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[42] Nagarajan V, Prabhu TK, Shankar MG, Jagadesh P. A study on the strength of the bacterial concrete embedded with Bacillus megaterium. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2017 Dec;4(12):1784-8. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[43] Tanyildizi H, Ziada M, Uysal M, Güngör ND, Coşkun A. Comparison of bacteria-based self-healing methods in metakaolin geopolymer mortars. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2022 Jun 1;16:e00895. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[44] Chahal N, Siddique R. Permeation properties of concrete made with fly ash and silica fume: Influence of ureolytic bacteria. Construction and Building Materials. 2013 Dec 1;49:161-74. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[45] Weber M, Thiele C. Correlation between compressive and tensile strength of old concretes: Applicability of the relationship described in EN 1992‐1‐1. Structural concrete. 2019 Feb;20(1):483-92. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[46] Siddique R, Chahal NK. Effect of ureolytic bacteria on concrete properties. Construction and building materials. 2011 Oct 1;25(10):3791-801. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[47] Bayati M, Saadabadi LA. Efficiency of bacteria based self-healing method in alkali-activated slag (AAS) mortars. Journal of Building Engineering. 2021 Oct 1;42:102492. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[48] Siddique R, Singh K, Singh M, Corinaldesi V, Rajor A. Properties of bacterial rice husk ash concrete. Construction and Building materials. 2016 Sep 15;121:112-9. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[49] Chaerun SK, Syarif R, Wattimena RK. Bacteria incorporated with calcium lactate pentahydrate to improve the mortar properties and self-healing occurrence. Scientific reports. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17873. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].