Investigation into Effect of Liquefaction on Behavior of Retaining Wall

Document Type : Original Article


Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran.


Retaining walls constructed adjacent to underground water are the structures which may be influenced by liquefaction. The design of these structures under vibration involves determining their displacements and forces caused by earthquake and liquefaction phenomena. In this study, it is attempted to assess the effect of liquefaction on the behavior of retaining walls using finite element method (FEM). The OPENSEES software is used for this purpose, which can simulate the behavior of saturated porous media using the u-P correlation formulation. Moreover, the Dafalias-Manzari critical state two-surface plas- ticity behavioral model is applied to simulate the behavior of sand, which can model a variety of behaviors of saturated sand in various uniaxial and cyclic loadings under drained and undrained conditions for different relative densities. The results of this study suggest that the OPENSEES software and Dafalias-Manzar behavioral model possess essential capabilities for numerical modeling of behavior of retaining walls under liquefaction conditions. The presence of retaining walls also chang- es the pattern of development of excess pore water pressure, particularly at middle depths of the wall.


Main Subjects

1. Kramer SL. Performance-based design methodologies for geotechnical earthquake engineering. Bulletin of      Earthquake Engineering.2014;12(3):1049-70.
2. Baska DA. An analytical/empirical model for prediction of lateral spread displacemen 2003.
3. Naseri F,  lotfollahi  S,  Bagherzadeh khalkhali  A.  Dynamic  Mechanical Behavior of Rock Mater Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2017;1(2):39-44.
4. Youd TL, Perkins DM. Mapping of liquefaction severity index. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 1987;113(11):1374-92.
5. Ghalandarzadeh A, Orita T, Towhata I, Yun F. Shaking table tests on seismic deformation   of   gravity   quay      Soils   and   foundations. 1998;38(Special):115-32.
6. Taboada V, Abdoun T, Dobry R, editor Prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading by dilatant sliding block model calibrated by centrifuge tests. Proc, 11th World Conf on Earthquake Engineering; 1996: Pergamon Oxford, UK.
7. Gonzalez L, Abdoun T, Sharp MK. Modelling of seismically induced liquefaction under high confining stre International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics. 2002;2(3):01-15.
8. Tamate S, Towhata Numerical simulation of ground flow caused by seismic liquefaction.    Soil    Dynamics    and    Earthquake    Engineering.1999;18(7):473-85.
9. Hadush S, Yashima A, Uzuoka R. Importance of viscous fluid characteristics in liquefaction induced lateral spreading analys Computers and Geotechnics. 2000;27(3):199-224.
10. Byrne PM. A model for predicting liquefaction induced displacemen 1991.
11. Sáez E, Ledezma Liquefaction mitigation using secant piles wall under a large water tank. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2015;79:415-28.
12. Boulanger RW, Khosravi M, Khosravi A, Wilson DW. Remediation of liquefaction effects for an embankment using soil-cement walls: Centrifuge and numerical modeling.  Soil  Dynamics  and  Earthquake  Engineering. 2018;114:38-50.
13. Dewoolkar M, Ko H-Y, Pak Experimental developments for studying static and seismic behavior of retaining walls with liquefiable backfills. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2000;19(8):583-93.
14. Hung W-Y, Lee C-J, Hu L-M. Study of the effects of container boundary and slope on soil liquefaction by centrifuge modeling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2018;113:682-97.
15. Liu H, Song E. Working mechanism of cutoff walls in reducing uplift of large underground structures induced by soil liquefaction. Computers and Geotechn 2006;33(4-5):209-21.
16. Liu C,  Tang  L,  Ling  X,  Deng  L,  Su  L,  Zhang  X.  Investigation  of liquefaction-induced  lateral  load  on  pile  group  behind  quay    Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2017;102:56-64.
17. Tang L, Ling X, Zhang X, Su L, Liu C, Li Response of a RC pile behind quay wall to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading: a shake-table investigation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2015;76:69-79.
18. Alyami M, Rouainia M, Wilkinson S. Numerical analysis of deformation behaviour of quay walls under earthquake loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2009;29(3):525-36.
19. Zienkiewicz OC, Chan A, Pastor M, Schrefler B, Shiomi T. Computational geomechanics: Citeseer; 1999.
20. Taiebat M, Shahir H, Pak A. Study of pore pressure variation during liquefaction using two constitutive models for sand. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2007;27(1):60-72.
21. Dafalias YF, Manzari MT. Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effect Journal of Engineering mechanics. 2004;130(6):622-34.
22. Biot MA. Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid‐saturated porous  solid.  II.  Higher  frequency  range.  The  Journal  of  the  acoustical Society of america. 1956;28(2):179-91.
23. Li X-S, Wang Y. Linear representation of steady-state line for sand. Journal  of      geotechnical      and      geoenvironmental      engineering.
24. Ishihara K,   Tatsuoka  F,   Yasuda  S.   Undrained  deformation  and liquefaction   of   sand   under   cyclic   stresse   Soils   and   foundations.1975;15(1):29-44.
25. Newmark NM. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankmen Geotechnique. 1965;15(2):139-60.
26. Newmark NM. A method of computation for structural dynam ASCE J Eng Mech div. 1959;85:67.
27. Das BM, Sobhan K. Principles of geotechnical engineering: Cengage learning; 2013.
28. Helal AA. Axially loaded pile behavior in sands with/without limited liquefaction: The University of Alabama in Huntsville; 2012.
29. OpenSees MF.  Open  system  for  earthquake engineering  simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California …;2013.
30. Maharjan M, Takahashi A. Centrifuge model tests on liquefaction-induced settlement and pore water migration in non-homogeneous soil depo Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2013;55:161-9.
31. Shahir H, Pak A, Taiebat M, Jeremić B. Evaluation of variation of permeability in liquefiable soil under earthquake loading. Computers and Geotechn 2012;40:74-88.