Evaluation of Seismic Performance of Concrete Gravity Dams Under Soil-structure-reservoir Interaction Exposed to Vertical Component of Near-field Earthquakes During Impounding Case study: Pine Flat Dam

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Civil engineering, Islamic Azad University-Electronic Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.


Given the current water crisis in the world and the fact that dams are superstructures for water conservation in agricultural and domestic uses, the seismic performance of Pine Flat Dam is evaluated under the soil-structure-reservoir interaction ex-posed to vertical component of near-field earthquakes in this study. Hence the dam is modeled in the plane strain space un-der the foundation-structure-fluid interaction using Abaqus finite element software in order to consider the effects of founda-tion flexibility and hydrodynamic forces. The reservoir is modeled in 3 full, half-full and empty conditions and the results are assessed and presented for each condition. The results of analysis show that when the dam is in use and the entire volume of reservoir is filled with water and the conditions of near-field earthquakes are predominated, more displacement is applied to the dam, which may make it enter the nonlinear region.


Main Subjects

1.Clarke R. Water: the international crisis: Routledge; 2013.
2.Langer EJS. Chemical and biological warfare (I): the research program. 1967;155(3759):174-9.
3.Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AYJSa. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. 2016;2(2):e1500323.
4.Escaleras M, Anbarci N, Register CAJPC. Public sector corruption and major earthquakes: A potentially deadly interaction. 2007;132(1-2):209-30.
5.Proulx J, Paultre P, Rheault J, Robert YJEe, dynamics s. An experimental investigation of water level effects on the dynamic behaviour of a large arch dam. 2001;30(8):1147-66.
6.Hu Y-X, Liu S-C, Dong W. Earthquake engineering: CRC Press; 2014.
7.Sepц╨lveda SA, Murphy W, Jibson RW, Petley DNJEg. Seismically induced rock slope failures resulting from topographic amplification of strong ground motions: The case of Pacoima Canyon, California. 2005;80(3-4):336-48.
8.Bayraktar A, Sevim Bе, Altuniе÷ik ACJFeia, design. Finite element model updating effects on nonlinear seismic response of arch damБ─⌠reservoirБ─⌠foundation systems. 2011;47(2):85-97.
9.Lin M-L, Wang K-LJEG. Seismic slope behavior in a large-scale shaking table model test. 2006;86(2-3):118-33.
10.Sooch GS, Bagchi AJJoAM. A new iterative procedure for deconvolution of seismic ground motion in dam-reservoir-foundation systems. 2014;2014.
11.Wang G, Wang Y, Lu W, Yu M, Wang CJES. Deterministic 3D seismic damage analysis of Guandi concrete gravity dam: A case study. 2017;148:263-76.
12.Ganaaty Y, Colough, R.W., Redpath, B.B.,. Exprimental study of dam-water-foundation interaction. In: -, editor. Tenth world confrence on earthquake engineering; 1989; Spain. SPAIN: -; 1989. p. -.
13.Hamidian D, Seyedpoor S, Salajegheh J. An investigation ofdam-water-foundation rock interaction effects on linear and nonlinear earthquake response of concrete arch dams. 2013.
14.Heirany Z, Ghaemian MJG. Effect of foundation in dynamic analysis of concrete gravity dams. 2012;64(8):641-6.
15.Wang G, Wang Y, Zhou W, Zhou CJSd, engineering e. Integrated duration effects on seismic performance of concrete gravity dams using linear and nonlinear evaluation methods. 2015;79:223-36.
16.Ouzandja D, Tiliouine BJAJfS, Engineering. Effects of DamБ─⌠Foundation Contact Conditions on Seismic Performance of Concrete Gravity Dams. 2015;40(11):3047-56.
17.L KM, J VA, B Nn. Evaluation of Eulerian and Lagrangian Methods in theAnalysis of Concrete Gravity Dam Including Dam WaterFoundation Interaction under Earthquake. Modares Civil Engineering Journal. 2011;11(4):107-31.
18.Fenves G, Chopra AKJEe, dynamics s. Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including reservoir bottom absorption and damБ─░waterБ─░foundation rock interaction. 1984;12(5):663-80.
19.Abaqus. 6.11 PR3 user manual.
20.Rashid M, Mansur M, Paramasivam PJJoMiCE. Correlations between mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. 2002;14(3):230-8.
21.Board G, Council NR. Practical Lessons fromthe Loma Prieta Earthquake: National Academies Press; 1994.
22.Cipar JJBotSSoA. Teleseismic observations of the 1976 Friuli, Italy earthquake sequence. 1980;70(4):963-83.
23.Census Interactive Population Search: CA -Hollister city". US Census Bureau Retrieved July 12, 2004.
24.Wesnousky SGJJoGRSE. Earthquakes, Quaternary faults, and seismic hazard in California. 1986;91(B12):12587-631.
25.Zhang C, Jin F. Seismic Safety Evaluation of High Concrete Dams: Part 1: State-of-the-Art Design and Research. Seismic Safety Evaluation of Concrete Dams: Elsevier; 2014. p. 67-78.
26.Toda S, Stein RS, RichardsБ─░Dinger K, Bozkurt SBJJoGRSE. Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: Animations built on earthquake stress transfer. 2005;110(B5).
Volume 2, Issue 4
December 2018
Pages 181-191
  • Receive Date: 24 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 02 September 2019
  • Accept Date: 19 October 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 December 2018