1. Kuhnle RA, Alonso CV, Shields FD. Geometry of scour holes associated with 90 spur dikes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1999;125(9):972-8.
2. Ghodsian M, Tehrani S. Scour around groins. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2001;16(1):60-8.
3. Nagy HM. Maximum depth of local scour near emerged vertical wall spur dike. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2004;43(6):819-29.
4. Nagy HM. Hydraulic evaluation of emerged and submerged spur-dikes: temporal bed evolution and equilibrium state characteristics. Alexandria Eng J. 2005;44(2):279-90.
5. Ardeshir A, Karami H, Saneie M, editors. Experimental study on the effect of secondary groyne on local scouring around first groyne. 7th International Civil Engineering Conference, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran;
6. Nasrollahi A, Ghodsian M, Neyshabouri S. Local scour at permeable spur dikes. J Appl Sci. 2008;8(19).
7. Fazli M, Ghodsian M, Neyshabouri SAAS. Scour and flow field around a spur dike in a 90 bend. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2008;23(1):56-68.
8. Zhang H, Nakagawa H. Characteristics of local flow and bed deformation at impermeable and permeable spur dykes. Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE. 2009;53:145-50.
9. Masjedi A, Akbari I, Abyar H. Evaluating scour at L-shape spur dike in a 180 degree bend. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2011;15(12):1740-5.
10. Teraguchi H, Nakagawa H, Kawaike K, Yasuyuki B, Zhang H. Effects of hydraulic structures on river morphological processes. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2011;26(3):283-303.
11. Osman MA, Saeed HN. Local Scour Depth at the Nose of Permeable and Impermeable Spur Dykes. University Of Khartoum Engineering Journal.2012;2(1).
12. Van Den Heever ADD. An investigation of the use of groynes as a means of riverbank erosion protection: Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University; 2013.
13. Ettema R. Scour at bridge piers. 1980.