Investigation the Deformations of Shahr-e- Bijar Dam During Impoundment

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.


Dam monitoring is possible by instrumentation at critical points and measurement of various parameters such as pore pressure and deformations, i.e. settlement and displacement. In this study, the monitoring of Shahr-e-Bijar Reservoir Dam is investigated using instrumentation data and numerical analysis. A finite element software package called Plaxis is used for the numerical analysis. According to the results of analyses carried out by the program that are in good agreement with observations and instrumentation data, it can be concluded that these programs are very useful for analyzing and predicting the behavior of earth dams. In this study, a variety of instrumentations used in rockfill dams are introduced and common methods and instruments are examined for measuring various geotechnical quantities. The situation of Shahr-e-Bijar Dam, i.e. deformation and seepage, are analyzed using instrumentation data provided by settlement meters and extensometers, which is measured over a relatively long period, and the results of dam modeling via finite element programs. One of the most important steps of dam construction is operation management and maintenance of such projects after design and construction phases. Accordingly, the results of dam monitoring and back analysis are employed to express the importance of these steps as a significant goal of this study and a practical part of dam operation management and maintenance process is also presented by examination of the results of the instrumentation of an earth dam. In summary, two- dimensional numerical modeling of the dam and its foundation is carried out via Plaxis version 8.2 after monitoring the behavior of Shar-e-Bijar Dam based on the information recorded by instrumentation system of the project and the results of numerical modeling are interpreted and compared with those of dam monitoring. Mohr-Coulomb behavioral model must be applied in this research.


Main Subjects

  1. Szostak-Chrzanowski A, Massiéra M, editors. Relation between monitoring and design aspects of large earth dams. Proceedings of the 3rd IAG Symposium on Geodesy for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering and 12- th FIG Symposium on Deformation Measurements, ed H Kahmen and A Chrzanowski, Baden, Austria, May; 2006.
  2. Wilkins R, Bastin G, Chrzanowski A, editors. Monitoring of structures and steep embankments: a fully automated approach. CSCE Annual Conference, Moncton, NB, Canada; 2003.
  3. Kondner RL. Hyperbolic stress-strain response: cohesive soils. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division. 1963;89(1):115-44.
  4. Szostak-Chrzanowski A, Chrzanowski A, Massiéra M, editors. Use of geodetic monitoring measurements in solving geomechanical problems in structural and mining engineering. Proceedings of the 11th Int Symp On Deformation Measurements; 2003.
  5. Moll S, Straubhaar R, editors. Performance of a high rockfill dam during construction and first impounding. Nam Ngum 2 CFR, Dams and Reservoirs under Changing Challenges. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Dams and Reservoirs under Changing Challenges—79 Annual Meeting of ICOLD, Swiss Committee on Dams; 2011.
  6. Pinto NdS, Marques Filho P. Estimating the maximum face deflection in CFRDs. International Journal on Hydropower and Dams. 1998;5:28-32.
  7. Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G. Soil mechanics in engineering practice: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
  8. Brown PH, Tullos D, Tilt B, Magee D, Wolf AT. Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of environmental management. 2009;90:S303-S11.
  9. Polimeni JM, Iorgulescu RI, Chandrasekara R. Trans-border public health vulnerability and hydroelectric  projects:  The  case  of  Yali  Falls  Dam. Ecological Economics. 2014;98:81-9.
  10. Zafarnejad F. The contribution of dams to Iran’s desertification. International Journal of Environmental Studies. 2009;66(3):327-41.
  11. Bertero   VV.   Yousef   Bozorgnia.   Earthquake   Engineering:   From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering. 2004.
  12. Pagano L, Desideri A, Vinale F. Interpreting settlement profiles of earth dams. Journal    of    geotechnical    and    geoenvironmental    engineering. 1998;124(10):923-32.
  13. Derakhshandi M, Pourbagherian H, Baziar M, Shariatmadari N, Sadeghpour A. Numerical analysis and monitoring of a rockfill dam at the end of construction (case study: Vanyar dam). International Journal of Civil Engineering. 2014;12(4):326-37.
  14. Terzaghi K. Stress distribution in dry and in saturated sand above a yielding trap-door. 1936.
  15. Fattah MY, Saba'a MR, Yousif MA. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of a Trial Embankment. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering. 2010;1(3):621.
  16. Henkel D, editor The shear strength of saturated remolded clay. Proc of research Conf on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils at Boulder; 1960.
  17. Dong W, Hu L, Yu YZ, Lv H. Comparison between Duncan and Chang’s EB model and the generalized plasticity model in the analysis of a high earth- rockfill dam. Journal of Applied Mathematics. 2013;2013.
  18. Ghanbari A, Rad SS. Development of an empirical criterion for predicting the hydraulic fracturing  in  the  core  of  earth  dams.  Acta  Geotechnica.2015;10(2):243-54.
  19. Gikas V, Sakellariou M. Settlement analysis of the Mornos earth dam (Greece): Evidence from numerical modeling and geodetic monitoring. Engineering Structures. 2008;30(11):3074-81.
Volume 2, Issue 1
March 2018
Pages 31-52
  • Receive Date: 14 January 2018
  • Revise Date: 30 January 2018
  • Accept Date: 26 March 2018
  • First Publish Date: 30 March 2018