Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Geometric Parameters of a Series of Attracting T-Shaped Spur Dikes on the Turbulent Flow Pattern

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Rouzbahan, Sari, Iran.



Spur dike is a structure that extends transversely from the river bank toward its thalweg and deflects the flows away from the bank toward the center. One common type of this structure is the T-shaped spur dike, and the wings present in this dike can have major effects on the proximate flow pattern. In this study, the turbulent flow around three attracting T-shaped spur dikes placed in series was simulated using the FLUENT, the finite volume method and the k-? turbulence model. The results of numerical modeling show that increasing the dike length and the spacing between dikes both alter the flow pattern around the structure, but flow pattern is more affected by the increase in the dike length than by the increase in the dike spacing.


Main Subjects

1. Fazli M, Ghodsian M, Neyshabouri SAAS. Scour and flow field around a spur dike in a 90 bend. International Journal of Sediment Research. 2008;23(1):56-68.
2. Elawady E, Michiue M, Hinokidani O. Movable bed scour around submerged spur-dikes. Proceedings of Hydraulic Engineering. 2001;45:373-8.
3. Vaghefi M, Ghodsian M, Salehi Neyshaboori S. Experimental study on the effect of a T-shaped spur dike length on scour in a 90 channel bend. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2009;34(2):337.
4. Vaghefi M, Shakerdargah M, Akbari M. Numerical investigation of the effect of Froude number on flow pattern around a submerged T-shaped spur dike in a 90 bend. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences. 2015;38(2):266-77.
5. Safarzadeh A, Salehi Neyshabouri SAA, Zarrati AR. Experimental investigation on 3D turbulent Flow around straight and T-Shaped groynes in a flat bed channel. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2016;142(8):04016021.
6. Mehraein M, Ghodsian M, Khosravi MM. Experimental study of submergence effect on turbulent parameter around spur dike located in a 90 bend. 2016.
7. Kuhnle R, Jia Y, Alonso C. Measured and simulated flow near spur dikes. US-China workshop on advanced computational modeling in hydroscience and engineering. Oxford, MS, USA; 2005.
8. Kuhnle RA, Jia Y, Alonso CV. Measured and simulated flow near a submerged spur dike. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2008;134(7):916-24.
9. Kuhnle RA, Alonso CV, Shields Jr FD. Local scour associated with angled spur dikes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2002;128(12):1087-93.
10. Salamatian S, Forghani M, Tabarestani MK. Flow Pattern and Stress Distribution around Three Spur Dike in Ninety Degree Bend. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2016;8(6).
11. Kumar M, Malik A. 3D Simulation of Flow around Different Types of Groyne Using ANSYS Fluent. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2016;2(10).
12. Karami H, Basser H, Ardeshir A, Hosseini SH. Verification of numerical study of scour around spur dikes using experimental data. Water and environment journal. 2014;28(1):124-34.
13. Yazdi J, Sarkardeh H, Azamathulla HM, Ghani AA. 3D simulation of flow around a single spur dike with free-surface flow. Intl J River Basin Management. 2010;8(1):55-62.
14. Duan JG, He L, Fu X, Wang Q. Mean flow and turbulence around experimental spur dike. Advances in Water Resources. 2009;32(12):1717-25.
15. Tang X, Ding X, Chen Z. Large eddy simulations of three-dimensional flows around a spur dike. Tsinghua Science & Technology. 2006;11(1):117-23.
16. Uijttewaal WS. Effects of groyne layout on the flow in groyne fields: Laboratory experiments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 2005;131(9):782-91.
17. Fei-Yong C, Ikeda S. Horizontal separation flows in shallow open channels with spur dikes. Journal of Hydroscience and hydraulic Engineering. 1997;15(2):15-30.
18. Osman AM, Thorne CR. Riverbank stability analysis. I: Theory. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering. 1988;114(2):134-50.
19. Barnjani SHR, Safari A, Mofrad BM. Numerical Simulation of Turbulence and Flow Velocity Distribution Around the Spur Dike Using FLUENT. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2017;1(1):28-32.
20. Safari A, Mofrad BM, Barnjani SHR. Investigating LES Turbulence Model in Modeling the Velocity Distribution Around the Hydraulic Structure Using ANSYS. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2017;1(2):33-8.
21. Mofrad BM, Barnjani SHR, Safari A. Modeling of Turbulent Flow Due to the Dam Break Against Trapezoidal Barrier. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2017;1(1):22-7