Modeling of Turbulent Flow Due to the Dam Break Against Trapezoidal Barrier

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Yasuj Branch, Yasouj University, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad, Iran.

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Bushehr Unit, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran .

10.15412/J.JCEMA.12010104

Abstract

Dam is considered as a strategic structure whose collapse and destruction is a catastrophic event and could bring about significant life threatening and financial losses. Also its destruction may cause environmental damages due to uncontrollable exit of large amounts of water and sediment from the reservoir which results into propagation of devastating flood at downstream. Presence of barriers and buildings changes the flow patterns downstream of a dam. Regarding the importance of this issue, in this research modeling of this phenomenon was performed in the presence of a trapezoidal barrier using the finite volume method and OpenFOAM software. Modeling is in 2D form and, for validation of the results, use has been made of the numerical and experimental research conducted by other researchers. The results show that this model has a good performance in simulation of these problems and has been able to simulate the results with a good accuracy, compared to the experimental results. For simulation of other phenomena similar to the dam break, the present model could be developed.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Fraccarollo L, Toro EF. Experimental and numerical assessment of the shallow water model for two-dimensional dam-break type problems. Journal of hydraulic research. 1995;33(6):843-64.
2. Soares-Frazão S, Zech Y. Experimental study of dam-break flow against an isolated obstacle. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2007;45(sup1):27-36.
3. Lauber G, Hager WH. Experiments to dambreak wave: Horizontal channel. Journal of Hydraulic research. 1998;36(3):291-307.
4. Ferrari A, Fraccarollo L, Dumbser M, Toro E, Armanini A. Three-dimensional flow evolution after a dam break. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2010;663:456-77.
5. Ozmen-Cagatay H, Kocaman S. Dam-break flows during initial stage using SWE and RANS approaches. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2010;48(5):603-11.
6. Biscarini C, Di Francesco S, Manciola P. CFD modelling approach for dam break flow studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 2010;14(4):705.
7. Bellos V, Hrissanthou V. Numerical simulation of a dam-break flood wave. European Water. 2011;33:45-53.
8. Soares-Frazão S. Experiments of dam-break wave over a triangular bottom sill. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2007;45(sup1):19-26.
9. Marsooli R, Zhang M, Wu W, editors. Vertical and horizontal two-dimensional numerical modeling of dam-break flow over fixed beds. World
Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011: Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability; 2011.
10. Ozmen-Cagatay H, Kocaman S. Dam-break flow in the presence of obstacle: experiment and CFD simulation. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics. 2011;5(4):541-52.
11. Oertel M, Bung DB. Initial stage of two-dimensional dam-break waves: laboratory versus VOF. Journal of Hydraulic Research. 2012;50(1):89-97.
12. Ozmen-Cagatay H, Kocaman S. Investigation of dam-break flow over abruptly contracting channel with trapezoidal-shaped lateral obstacles. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2012;134(8):081204.
13. Holzinger G. CD-Laboratory-Particulate Flow Modelling Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria. 2014.
14. Shih T-H, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J. A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids. 1995;24(3):227-38.
15. Bremhorst K. Modified form of the kw model for predicting wall turbulence. Journal of Fluid Engineering. 1981;103:456-60.
16. Europe F. GAMBIT users’ manual. Version. 2001.
17. Hirt CW, Nichols BD. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of computational physics. 1981;39(1):201-25.
18. Chang S-C. Courant number insensitive CE/SE schemes. AIAA paper. 2002;3890:2002.
19. Jasak H. OpenFOAM: open source CFD in research and industry. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering.
2009;1(2):89-94.
Volume 1, Issue 1
June 2017
Pages 22-27
  • Receive Date: 19 March 2017
  • Revise Date: 22 April 2021
  • Accept Date: 26 April 2017
  • First Publish Date: 01 July 2017