Evaluation of Slippage Resistance of the Runway of the International Airport of Imam Khomeini

Document Type : Original Article


1 Dept. of Civil Engineering–Road & Transportation, North Tehran Center, Payame Noor Univ. (PNU), Tehran, Iran

2 Dept. of Civil Engineering–Road & Transportation, North Tehran Center, Payame Noor Univ. (PNU), Tehran, Iran.



A layer of rubber surface in an aircraft will be separated by takeoff and landing in flight surfaces and these layers stick to the surface of the runway and by repetition, the thickness of these layers increases and improves lubrication and reduces the effect of signs on flight surfaces. In this paper, we prepared a diagrammatic presentation of test in the friction between eastern and western parts of the flight. Average values of friction of each of the three sections of the runway, in down stroke and up stroke, were measured once before tire removal operation and the second time after the tire relaxation and the exploitation rate index and minimum quality of flight surfaces were determined and then compared with the values and standards of the Federal Aviation Organization ICAO and international aviation regulations. The results show that the average coefficients of friction before removal of the tires, to the eastern part and the western part are 0.31 and 0.63, respectively which are lower than standard rates in comparison with standard values. And along with removal of tires, according to the minimum number of daily landings in runway of Imam Khomeini airport friction test should be measured every 4 months. Also, after tire removal, friction test should be carried out again and average friction coefficients for eastern and western parts were measured to be 0.72 and 0.67, respectively which were obtained after comparison with standard values.


Main Subjects

  1. Testing ASf, Materials. Annual Book of ASTM Standards: ASTM; 2003.
    2. Vaiana R, Praticò FG, Iuele T, Gallelli V, Minani V, editors. Effect of Asphalt Mix Properties on Surface Texture: an Experimental Study. Applied Mechanics and Materials; 2013: Trans Tech Publ.
    3. Hall J, Smith K, Titus-Glover L, Evans L, Wambold J, Yager T. Guide for Pavement Friction Contractor’s Final Report for National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 01-43. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC. 2009.
    4. Mirzaeinejad H, Mirzaei M. A novel method for non-linear control of wheel slip in anti-lock braking systems. Control Engineering Practice. 2010;18(8):918-26.
    5. Dugoff H, Fancher P, Segel L. An analysis of tire traction properties and their influence on vehicle dynamic performance. SAE Technical Paper, 1970
    6. Hosking R. Road aggregates and skidding1992.
    7. Kuttesch JS. Quantifying the relationship between skid resistance and wet weather accidents for Virginia data. 2004.
    8. Wang H, Flintsch GW, editors. Investigation of Short-and Long-Term Variations of Pavement Surface Characteristics at the Virginia Smart Road. Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting; 2007.
    9. Larson RM, Hoerner TE, Smith KD, Wolters AS. Relationship between skid resistance numbers measured with ribbed and smooth tire and wet accident locations. 2008.
    10. Mayora JMP, Piña RJ. An assessment of the skid resistance effect on traffic safety under wet-pavement conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention.
    11. Khasawneh M, Liang RY. Temperature Effect on Frictional Properties of HMA at Different Polishing Stages. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering. 2012;6(1):39-53.
    12. Kemp R. Investigates the effect of surface shear on pavements near road intersection. 2011.
    13. Button JW, Perdomo D, Lytton RL. Influence of aggregate on rutting in asphalt concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record. 1990(1259).
    14. Watanabe T, Fukui S, editors. A method for controlling tactile sensation of surface roughness using ultrasonic vibration. Robotics and Automation, 1995 Proceedings, 1995 IEEE International Conference on; 1995: IEEE.
    15. Zhang H, Ong N, Lam Y. Mold surface roughness effects on cavity filling of polymer melt in micro injection molding. The International Journal of
    Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2008;37(11):1105-12.
    16. Rezaei A. Development of a prediction model for skid resistance of asphalt pavements: Texas A & M University; 2012.
    17. Safavizadeh SA. Fatigue and fracture characterization of GlasGrid® reinforced asphalt concrete pavement: North Carolina State University; 2015.
    18. De Wit CC, Tsiotras P, editors. Dynamic tire friction models for vehicle traction control. Decision and Control, 1999 Proceedings of the 38th IEEE
    Conference on; 1999: IEEE.
    19. Canudas-de-Wit C, Tsiotras P, Velenis E, Basset M, Gissinger G. Dynamic friction models for road/tire longitudinal interaction. Vehicle System
    Dynamics. 2003;39(3):189-226.
    20. Kermani MS, Safarzadeh M. Petrographic assessment of re-textured road surface aggregates. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment.
    21. Henry JJ. Evaluation of pavement friction characteristics: Transportation Research Board; 2000.
    22. Kazda A, Caves RE. Airport design and operation: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2010.


Volume 1, Issue 1
June 2017
Pages 16-21
  • Receive Date: 19 March 2017
  • Revise Date: 15 April 2017
  • Accept Date: 26 April 2017
  • First Publish Date: 01 July 2017