The use of Unaccounted Water Patterns in Water Distribution Network Model Calibration

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering. Roudehen Branch. Islamic Azad University.Tehran. Iran.

Abstract

With the growth of the urban population and the development of cities, water distribution systems have become very important. Considering the complexity of these systems and the large scale of decision-making in analysis, design, operation and maintenance, the need for computer modelling of networks has become more important. The most important issue in modelling is consistency between calculated and measured data. The amount of unaccounted water in a distribution system can be determined by conducting water balance studies in the system or in an enclosed measurement area. It can be seen that determining the optimal pattern of unaccounted water to complete the data of total water consumption in the network in a seta model, in a situation where the results of unaccounted water studies are not available, is still needed as one of the main elements in model calibration. . In order to solve this problem, the current research was carried out in order to review and improve the continuous model of water distribution network by introducing, checking and implementing an optimal integrated experimental approach of the unaccounted water model. The use of the option of the inverse model of the customers' consumption is not considered as a water model; for calibrating the hydraulic model of the distribution network, it provided a more acceptable simulation in the maximum range from 30% to 4% and in the average maximum difference from 23% to 3%.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Copyright © 2022 Nader Torkaman. This is an open access paper distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application is published by Pendar Pub; Journal p-ISSN 2676-332X; Journal e-ISSN 2588-2880.

 

[1] Fan X, Wang X, Zhang X, Yu PA. Machine learning based water pipe failure prediction: The effects of engineering, geology, climate and socio-economic factors. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2022 Mar 1;219:108185. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[2] Lu Q, Zhang W. Integrating dynamic Bayesian network and physics-based modeling for risk analysis of a time-dependent power distribution system during hurricanes. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2022 Apr 1;220:108290. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[3] Hanafy NA, El-Kemary MA. Silymarin/curcumin loaded albumin nanoparticles coated by chitosan as muco-inhalable delivery system observing anti-inflammatory and anti COVID-19 characterizations in oleic acid triggered lung injury and in vitro COVID-19 experiment. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2022 Feb 15;198:101-10. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[4] Garzón A, Kapelan Z, Langeveld J, Taormina R. Machine Learning‐Based Surrogate Modeling for Urban Water Networks: Review and Future Research Directions. Water Resources Research. 2022 May;58(5):e2021WR031808. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[5] Jana D, Patil J, Herkal S, Nagarajaiah S, Duenas-Osorio L. CNN and Convolutional Autoencoder (CAE) based real-time sensor fault detection, localization, and correction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2022 Apr 15;169:108723. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[6] Mehedi MA, Khosravi M, Yazdan MM, Shabanian H. Exploring temporal dynamics of river discharge using univariate long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network at East Branch of Delaware River. Hydrology. 2022 Nov 11;9(11):202. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[7] Perez-Ramirez CA, Amezquita-Sanchez JP, Valtierra-Rodriguez M, Adeli H, Dominguez-Gonzalez A, Romero-Troncoso RJ. Recurrent neural network model with Bayesian training and mutual information for response prediction of large buildings. Engineering Structures. 2019 Jan 1;178:603-15. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[8] Shin S, Lee S, Judi DR, Parvania M, Goharian E, McPherson T, Burian SJ. A systematic review of quantitative resilience measures for water infrastructure systems. Water. 2018 Feb 7;10(2):164. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[9]  Malhotra M, Nimbalkar SU, Armstrong KO, Thirumaran K, Garcia Gonzalez S. Plant Water Profiler: A Water Balance and True Cost of Water Calculator for Manufacturing Plants. Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); 2021 Apr 1. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[10] Armstrong KO, Malhotra M, Nimbalkar SU, Shibu A, Samuel R. Plant Water Profiler: A Tool for Understanding Water Use, Cost and Savings Potential for Manufacturing Plants. Oak Ridge National Lab.(ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); 2019 Nov 1. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[11] Jawwad M, Khattak KS, Khan ZH, Gulliver TA, Khan AN, Khan MA. Sustainable and Resilient Smart Water Grids: A Solution for Developing Countries. Emitter International Journal of Engineering Technology. 2021 Jun 16;9(1):204-19. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[12] Bharti N, Khandekar N, Sengupta P, Bhadwal S, Kochhar I. Dynamics of urban water supply management of two Himalayan towns in India. Water Policy. 2020 Feb 1;22(S1):65-89. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[13] Raut N, Kashyap SR. Assessment of water reuse potential of wastewater treatment systems used in Mumbai, India. International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub. 2021 Jan 1;3(Special Issue ICEST 1S):12-9. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[14] Elkharbotly MR, Seddik M, Khalifa A. Toward sustainable water: prediction of non-revenue water via artificial neural network and multiple linear regression modelling approach in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2022 Sep 1;13(5):101673. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[15] Quinones-Grueiro M, Milián MA, Rivero MS, Neto AJ, Llanes-Santiago O. Robust leak localization in water distribution networks using computational intelligence. Neurocomputing. 2021 May 28;438:195-208. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[16] Babamiri AS, Pishvaee MS, Mirzamohammadi S. The analysis of financially sustainable management strategies of urban water distribution network under increasing block tariff structure: A system dynamics approach. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2020 Sep 1;60:102193. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[17] Naderi MM, Mirchi A, Bavani AR, Goharian E, Madani K. System dynamics simulation of regional water supply and demand using a food-energy-water nexus approach: Application to Qazvin Plain, Iran. Journal of environmental management. 2021 Feb 15;280:111843. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[18] De Souza Groppo G, Costa MA, Libânio M. Predicting water demand: A review of the methods employed and future possibilities. Water Supply. 2019 Dec 1;19(8):2179-98. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[19] Krueger EH, Borchardt D, Jawitz JW, Klammler H, Yang S, Zischg J, Rao PS. Resilience dynamics of urban water supply security and potential of tipping points. Earth's Future. 2019 Oct;7(10):1167-91. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[20] Brentan B, Meirelles G, Luvizotto Jr E, Izquierdo J. Joint operation of pressure-reducing valves and pumps for improving the efficiency of water distribution systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 2018 Sep 1;144(9):04018055. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[21] Smolak K, Kasieczka B, Fialkiewicz W, Rohm W, Siła-Nowicka K, Kopańczyk K. Applying human mobility and water consumption data for short-term water demand forecasting using classical and machine learning models. Urban Water Journal. 2020 Jan 2;17(1):32-42. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[22] Mubvaruri F, Hoko Z, Mhizha A, Gumindoga W. Investigating trends and components of non-revenue water for Glendale, Zimbabwe. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. 2022 Jun 1;126:103145. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[23] Shushu UP, Komakech HC, Dodoo-Arhin D, Ferras D, Kansal ML. Managing non-revenue water in Mwanza, Tanzania: A fast-growing sub-Saharan African city. Scientific African. 2021 Jul 1;12:e00830. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[24] Wu ZY, He Y. Time series data decomposition-based anomaly detection and evaluation framework for operational management of smart water grid. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 2021 Sep 1;147(9):04021059. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[25] Ramos HM, Morani MC, Carravetta A, Fecarrotta O, Adeyeye K, López-Jiménez PA, Pérez-Sánchez M. New challenges towards smart systems’ efficiency by digital twin in water distribution networks. Water. 2022 Apr 17;14(8):1304. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[26] Torkaman N, Ahmadi H, Aminnejad B. Calibration of the continuous water model based on the NRW patterns. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research. 2021 Jul 3;9(3):194-202. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[27] Koo KM, Han KH, Jun KS, Lee G, Kim JS, Yum KT. Performance assessment for short-term water demand forecasting models on distinctive water uses in Korea. Sustainability. 2021 May 27;13(11):6056. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[28] Xue M, Chew AW, Cai J, Pok J, Kalfarisi R, Wu ZY. Improving near real-time anomaly event detection and classification with trend change detection for smart water grid operation management. Urban Water Journal. 2022 Jul 3;19(6):547-57. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[29] Aksela K, Aksela M. Demand estimation with automated meter reading in a distribution network. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 2011 Sep 1;137(5):456-67. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[30] Torralbo I, Perez-Grande I, Sanz-Andres A, Piqueras J. Correlation of spacecraft thermal mathematical models to reference data. Acta Astronautica. 2018 Mar 1;144:305-19. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].