Investigating Shear Bands Propagation in Sands by Using the Developed Elemental-like Direct Shear-Faulting Box

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

International Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This study investigates faults propagation in granular soils using the developed elemental-like direct shear-faulting box by detecting shear bands formation within soil samples. For this sake, first, some modifications are applied to the direct shear box in the Earthquake Research Institute. In this regard, two blocks are built at an angle of 45 degrees that can be moved relative to each other. Transparent walls are employed to increase the static resistance. Moreover, four screws are installed on the floor of the device. The friction in the test is reduced by using several ball bearings. The required thickness for the box walls is determined using a numerical simulation in ABAQUS software. To investigate faulting in granular soils, Firoozkooh sand is utilized and placed in the developed shear box. The overhead load is modeled by applying air pressure to a rubber membrane containing water. By continuous imaging of soil profiles, alterations in the soil surface are recorded, and an image correlation method is employed to predict the amount of fault-induced displacements, strains, and dilations. Results verify that the dilation effect elevates with increasing moisture content and wanes with the addition of fine-grained percentage and by boosting vertical loads. Moreover, various behavior has been observed without softening for cementitious sands.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Copyright © 2022 Ahmad Khaleghi. This is an open access paper distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application is published by Pendar Pub; Journal p-ISSN 2676-332X; Journal e-ISSN 2588-2880.

[1] Papadimitriou EE, Karakostas VG, Papazachos BC. Rupture zones in the area of the 17.08. 99 Izmit (NW Turkey) large earthquake (Mw 7.4) and stress changes caused by its generation. Journal of Seismology. 2001 Apr;5(2):269-76. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[2] Felzer KR, Becker TW, Abercrombie RE, Ekström G, Rice JR. Triggering of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake by aftershocks of the 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2002 Sep;107(B9):ESE-6. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[3] Chen YG, Lai KY, Lee YH, Suppe J, Chen WS, Lin YN, Wang Y, Hung JH, Kuo YT. Coseismic fold scarps and their kinematic behavior in the 1999 Chiā€Chi earthquake Taiwan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2007 Mar;112(B3). [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[4] Xiao H, Ivancic R, Zhang G, Riggleman R, Liu A, Durian D. Strain localization and shear band formation during tensile tests of disordered floating granular monolayers. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2020 Mar 5;65. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[5] Thomas TY. Plastic flow and fracture in solids. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 1958:291–322. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[6] Alshibli KA, Batiste SN, Sture S. Strain localization in sand: plane strain versus triaxial compression. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 2003 Jun;129(6):483-94. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[7] Mühlhaus HB, Vardoulakis I. The thickness of shear bands in granular materials. Geotechnique. 1987 Sep;37(3):271-83. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[8] Bray JD, Seed RB, Cluff LS, Seed HB. Earthquake fault rupture propagation through soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 1994 Mar;120(3):543-61. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[9] Zhu H, Zhou WH, Yin ZY. Deformation mechanism of strain localization in 2D numerical interface tests. Acta Geotechnica. 2018 Jun;13(3):557-73. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[10] Hazeghian M, Soroush A. DEM-aided study of shear band formation in dip-slip faulting through granular soils. Computers and Geotechnics. 2016 Jan 1;71:221-36. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[11] Zhou W, Yang L, Ma G, Xu K, Lai Z, Chang X. DEM modeling of shear bands in crushable and irregularly shaped granular materials. Granular Matter. 2017 May;19(2):1-2. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[12] Kollmer JE, Shreve T, Claussen J, Gerth S, Salamon M, Uhlmann N, Schröter M, Pöschel T. Migrating shear bands in shaken granular matter. Physical Review Letters. 2020 Jul 21;125(4):048001. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[13] Joer H, Lanier J, Desrues J, Flavigny E. " 1? 2?": A New Shear Apparatus to Study the Behavior of Granular Materials. ASTM International; 1992. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[14] Lo SC, Chu J, Lee IK. Investigation of the strain-softening behavior of granular soils with a new multiaxial cell. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 1994 Sep 1;17(3):325-36. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[15] Stone KJ, Brown TA. Simulation of ground loss in centrifuge model tests. Geotechnical Testing Journal. 1993 Jun 1;16(2):253-8. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[16] Wang JJ, Zhang HP, Wen HB, Liang Y. Shear strength of an accumulation soil from direct shear test. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology. 2015 Mar 4;33(2):183-90. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
[17] Ahmadi M, Moosavi M, Jafari MK. Water content effect on the fault rupture propagation through wet soil-using direct shear tests. InAdvances in Laboratory Testing and Modelling of Soils and Shales 2017 Jan 18 (pp. 131-138). Springer, Cham. [View at Google Scholar]; [View at Publisher].
Volume 6, Issue 1
March 2022
Pages 1-12
  • Receive Date: 26 January 2022
  • Revise Date: 27 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 09 March 2022
  • First Publish Date: 09 March 2022