1. Field JE, Walley S, Proud W, Goldrein H, Siviour C. Review of experimental techniques for high rate deformation and shock studies. International journal of impact engineering. 2004;30(7):725-75.
2. Nemat-Nasser S. High strain rate tension and compression tests. ASM hand book. 2000;8:427-8.
3. Walley S. Historical review of high strain rate and shock properties of ceramics relevant to their application in armour. Advances in Applied Ceramics. 2010;109(8):446-66.
4. Zhou Y, Zhao J. Advances in rock dynamics and applications: CRC Press; 2011.
5. Sharpe WN. Springer handbook of experimental solid mechanics: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.
6. Toutlemonde F, Gary G. Dynamic behavior of concrete: experimental aspects. Dynamic behavior of concrete and seismic engineering. 2009:1-54.
7. Zhang Q, Zhao J. A review of dynamic experimental techniques and mechanical behaviour of rock materials. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2014;47(4):1411-78.
8. Zhao J, Zhou Y, Xia K. Advances in rock dynamics modelling, testing and engineering. Harmonising Rock Engineering and the Environment. 2011:147.
9. Zhao J, Zhou Y, Hefny A, Cai J, Chen S, Li H, et al. Rock dynamics research related to cavern development for ammunition storage. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 1999;14(4):513-26.
10. Xia K, editor Status of characterization of strength and fracture properties of rocks under dynamic loading. Rock fragmentation by blasting: proceedings of the 10th international symposium on rock fragmentation by blasting; 2012: CRC Press.
11. Subhash G, Maiti S, Geubelle PH, Ghosh D. Recent advances in dynamic indentation fracture, impact damage and fragmentation of ceramics. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 2008;91(9):2777-91.
12. Malvar LJ, Ross CA. Review of strain rate effects for concrete in tension. Materials Journal. 1998;95(6):735-9.
13. Gama BA, Lopatnikov SL, Gillespie JW. Hopkinson bar experimental technique: a critical review. Applied mechanics reviews. 2004;57(4):223-50.
14. Kuhn H, Medlin D. ASM Handbook. Volume 8: Mechanical Testing and Evaluation. ASM International, Member/Customer Service Center, Materials Park, OH 44073-0002, USA, 2000 998. 2000.
15. Cadoni E. Dynamic characterization of orthogneiss rock subjected to intermediate and high strain rates in tension. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 2010;43(6):667-76.
16. Chen WW, Song B. Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar: design, testing and applications: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
17. Gray III GT. Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar testing. ASM Handbook, Mechanical testing and evaluation. 2000;8:462-76.
18. Foster J. Comments on the validity of test conditions for Kolsky bar testing of elastic-brittle materials. Experimental mechanics. 2012;52(9):1559-63.
19. Hartley R, Cloete T, Nurick G. An experimental assessment of friction effects in the split Hopkinson pressure bar using the ring compression test. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2007;34(10):1705-28.
20. Davies E, Hunter S. The dynamic compression testing of solids by the method of the split Hopkinson pressure bar. Journal of the Mechanics and
Physics of Solids. 1963;11(3):155-79.
21. Young C, Powell C, editors. Lateral inertia effects on rock failure in split-Hopkinson-bar experiments. 20th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS); 1979: American Rock Mechanics Association.
22. Hakalehto KO. A study of the dynamic behaviour of rock using the Hopkinson split bar method: University of Minnesota; 1967.
23. Perkins R, Green S, Friedman M, editors. Uniaxial stress behavior of porphyritic tonalite at strain rates to 103/second. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts; 1970: Elsevier.
24. Siviour C, Grantham S. High resolution optical measurements of specimen deformation in the split Hopkinson pressure bar. The Imaging Science Journal. 2009;57(6):333-43.
25. Gary G, Bailly P. Behaviour of quasi-brittle material at high strain rate.Experiment and modelling. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids. 1998;17(3):403-20.
26. Asprone D, Cadoni E, Prota A, Manfredi G. Dynamic behavior of a Mediterranean natural stone under tensile loading. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2009;46(3):514-20.
27. Huang S, Xia K, Dai F. Establishment of a dynamic Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion for rocks. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation. 2012;13(1):55-60.
28. Lu Y, Li Q. About the dynamic uniaxial tensile strength of concrete-like materials. International journal of impact engineering. 2011;38(4):171-80.
29. Gilat A, Cheng C-S. Torsional split Hopkinson bar tests at strain rates above 104s− 1. Experimental Mechanics. 2000;40(1):54-9.
30. Omidvar M, Iskander M, Bless S. Stress-strain behavior of sand at high strain rates. International journal of impact engineering. 2012;49:192-213.
31. Dai F, Xia K, Zheng H, Wang Y. Determination of dynamic rock mode-I fracture parameters using cracked chevron notched semi-circular bend specimen. Engineering fracture mechanics. 2011;78(15):2633-44.
32. Kawakita M, Kinoshita S. The dynamic fracture properties of rocks under confining pressure. Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University. 1981;15(4):467-78.
33. Christensen R, Swanson S, Brown W. Split-Hopkinson-bar tests on rock under confining pressure. Experimental Mechanics. 1972;12(11):508-13.
34. Frew DJ, Akers SA, Chen W, Green ML. Development of a dynamic triaxial Kolsky bar. Measurement Science and Technology. 2010;21(10):105704.
35. Carmona S, Aguado A. New model for the indirect determination of the tensile stress–strain curve of concrete by means of the Brazilian test.
Materials and structures. 2012;45(10):1473-85.