A Novel Type of Alkaline Activator for Geopolymer Concrete Based on Metakaolin

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In recent years, geopolymers, as a new class of green cement binders, have been considered as an environmental-friendly alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), which can potentially reduce negative environmental impacts of OPC, including carbon footprint and energy consumption. In this experimental research, effects of different alkaline activator solutions on the compressive, indirect tensile, and flexural strengths, water absorption, and resistance to an acidic condition of metakaolin-based Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) were investigated. Furthermore, a novel type of alkaline activator for GPC was introduced. In this regard, GPC specimens based on metakaolin were manufactured and cured at 90 ˚C. The results showed that the addition of NaOH to the mix after 3 min of mixing KOH and Na2SiO3 with dry components (1/3 of the total mixing duration) resulted in the highest compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths as well as the lowest water absorption capacity and weight loss under acidic condition, amongst other cases.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Copyright © 2021 Amir Bahador Moradikhou. This is an open access paper distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application is published by Pendar Pub; Journal p-ISSN 2676-232X; Journal e-ISSN 2588-2880.

[1] Moradikhou AB, Esparham A, Avanaki MJ. Effect of Hybrid Fibers on Water absorption and Mechanical Strengths of Geopolymer Concrete based on Blast Furnace Slag. Journal of civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2019 Dec 1;3(4):195-211. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[2] Hosseini MH, Mousavi Kashi A, Emami F, Esparham A. Effect of Simple and Hybrid Polymer Fibers on Mechanical Strengths and High-temperature Resistance of Metakaolin-based Geopolymer Concrete. Modares Civil Engineering journal. 2020 May 10;20(2):147-61. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]3
[3] Behnood A, Golafshani EM. Predicting the compressive strength of silica fume concrete using hybrid artificial neural network with multi-objective grey wolves. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018 Nov 20;202:54-64. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[4] Andrejkovičová S, Sudagar A, Rocha J, Patinha C, Hajjaji W, da Silva EF, Velosa A, Rocha F. The effect of natural zeolite on microstructure, mechanical and heavy metals adsorption properties of metakaolin based geopolymers. Applied Clay Science. 2016 Jun 1;126:141-52. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[5] Görhan G, Kürklü G. The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures. Composites part b: engineering. 2014 Mar 1;58:371-7. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[6] Amnadnua K, Tangchirapat W, Jaturapitakkul C. Strength, water permeability, and heat evolution of high strength concrete made from the mixture of calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Materials & Design. 2013 Oct 1;51:894-901. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[7] Fernández-Jiménez A, Garcia-Lodeiro I, Palomo A. Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials. Journal of Materials Science. 2007 May;42(9):3055-65. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[8] Zhang HY, Kodur V, Qi SL, Cao L, Wu B. Development of metakaolin–fly ash based geopolymers for fire resistance applications. Construction and Building Materials. 2014 Mar 31;55:38-45. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[9] Palomo A, Blanco-Varela MT, Granizo ML, Puertas F, Vazquez T, Grutzeck MW. Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin. Cement and Concrete research. 1999 Jul 1;29(7):997-1004. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[10] Zhang M, Guo H, El-Korchi T, Zhang G, Tao M. Experimental feasibility study of geopolymer as the next-generation soil stabilizer. Construction and building materials. 2013 Oct 1;47:1468-78. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[11] Moradikhou AB, Esparham A, Avanaki MJ. Physical & mechanical properties of fiber reinforced metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials. 2020 Aug 10;251:118965. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[12] Etemadi M, Pouraghajan M, Gharavi H. Investigating the effect of rubber powder and nano silica on the durability and strength characteristics of geopolymeric concretes. Journal of civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2020 Dec 1;4(4):243-52. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[13] Esparham A, Moradikhou AB, Jamshidi Avanaki M. Effect of Various Alkaline Activator Solutions on Compressive Strength of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Journal of civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2020 Jun 1;4(2):115-23. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[14] Mahboubi B, Guo Z, Wu H. Evaluation of durability behavior of geopolymer concrete containing Nano-silica and Nano-clay additives in acidic media. Journal of civil Engineering and Materials Application. 2019 Sep 1;3(3):163-71. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[15] Xu H, Van Deventer JS. The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals. International journal of mineral processing. 2000 Jun 1;59(3):247-66. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[16] Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT. Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future. Cement and concrete research. 1999 Aug 1;29(8):1323-9. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[17] Sharma A, Ahmad J. Experimental study of factors influencing compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Int J Eng Tech Res. 2017;4(5):1306-13. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[18] Singhal D. Development of mix design method for geopolymer concrete. Advances in concrete construction. 2017 Aug;5(4):377. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[19] Patel YJ, Shah N. Development of self-compacting geopolymer concrete as a sustainable construction material. Sustainable Environment Research. 2018 Nov 1;28(6):412-21. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[20] Petrus HT, Hulu JO, Dalton GS, Malinda EL, Prakosa RA. Effect of bentonite addition on geopolymer concrete from geothermal silica. InMaterials Science Forum 2016 (Vol. 841, pp. 7-15). Trans Tech Publications Ltd. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[21] Sanni SH, Khadiranaikar RB. Performance of alkaline solutions on grades of geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 2013 Nov;2(11):366-71. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[22] Raijiwala DB, Patil HS, Kundan IU. Effect of alkaline activator on the strength and durability of geopolymer concrete. Journal of Engineering Research and Studies. 2012 Mar;3(1):18-21. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[23] Wang H, Li H, Yan F. Synthesis and mechanical properties of metakaolinite-based geopolymer. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2005 Oct 31;268(1-3):1-6. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[24] Mishra A, Choudhary D, Jain N, Kumar M, Sharda N, Dutt D. Effect of concentration of alkaline liquid and curing time on strength and water absorption of geopolymer concrete. ARPN Journal of engineering and Applied Sciences. 2008 Feb;3(1):14-8. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[25] Morsy MS, Alsayed SH, Al-Salloum Y, Almusallam T. Effect of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratios on strength and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer binder. Arabian journal for science and engineering. 2014 Jun;39(6):4333-9. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[26] ASTM C33 / C33M-18, Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, www.astm.org. [View at Publisher]
[27] ASTM C127-15, Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, www.astm.org. [View at Publisher]
[28] ASTM C128-15, Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, www.astm.org. [View at Publisher]
[29] ASTM C136 / C136M-14, Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, www.astm.org.  [View at Publisher]
[30] ASTM D2419-14, Standard Test Method for Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregate, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014, www.astm.org.  [View at Publisher]
[31] British Standards Institution, 1983, Testing Concrete: Method for Determination of the Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes, BS1881: Part116: 1983, London.  [View at Publisher]
[32] ASTM C496 / C496M-17, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, www.astm.org. [View at Publisher]
[33] ASTM C293 / C293M-16, Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam With Center-Point Loading), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, www.astm.org  [View at Publisher]
[34] ASTM C642-13, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013, www.astm.org. [View at Publisher]