Investigating the Effect of Rubber Powder and Nano Silica on the Durability and Strength Characteristics of Geopolymeric Concretes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Centre for Infrastructure Engineering, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia.

2 School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

3 School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In this research, the effect of adding different percentages of nano-silica and rubber powder on the compressive strength of the geopolymeric concrete specimens is investigated. The set of performed tests includes the compressive and tensile strength tests of the geopolymeric concretes. Due to the high rate of consumed concrete and the daily increase of the need for cement production, it is essential to consider environmental defects of this material and present new replacement products to move towards sustainable development. Low shrinkage, high compressive, and tensile strengths are among the main properties of produced concrete. Also, the application of nanoparticles, due to their specific physical and chemical properties, in many respects, are very good candidates for producing novel materials with unique capabilities. Hence, the use of nano-silica as one of the nanotechnology products which could play the role of a very active artificial pozzolan in concrete has been under the focus of attention. Replacement of the rubber powder in the construction industry, due to the irresolvability of this type of wastes and also its specific structure such as improved ductility, reduced density, and improved resistance against concrete cracking, has been practiced today. The aim of this research is to implement the two mentioned materials as additives in the concrete mix design and to investigate their effect on the increase of the compressive and tensile strengths in concrete. The results of this research have shown that the use of nano-silica powder and rubber powder results in the increase of the compressive strength of concrete up to  1.45 times that of the control specimen using the nano-silica powder and 1.35 times that of the control specimen using the rubber powder.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

[1] Aslani F, Deghani A, Asif Z. Development of lightweight rubberized geopolymer concrete by using polystyrene and recycled crumb-rubber aggregates. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2020 Feb 1;32(2):04019345. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[2] Aly AM, El-Feky MS, Kohail M, Nasr ES. Performance of geopolymer concrete containing recycled rubber. Construction and Building Materials. 2019 May 20;207:136-44. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[3] Abd-Elaal ES, Araby S, Mills JE, Youssf O, Roychand R, Ma X, Zhuge Y, Gravina RJ. Novel approach to improve crumb rubber concrete strength using thermal treatment. Construction and Building Materials. 2019 Dec 30;229:116901. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[4] Murugan RB, Natarajan C. Investigation of the behaviour of concrete containing waste tire crumb rubber. InAdvances in Structural Engineering 2015 (pp. 1795-1802). Springer, New Delhi. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[5] Naito C, States J, Jackson C, Bewick B. Assessment of crumb rubber concrete for flexural structural members. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2014 Oct 1;26(10):04014075. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[6Xu X, Zhang Z, Hu Y, Wang X. Bearing Strength of Crumb Rubber Concrete under Partial Area Loading. Materials. 2020 Jan;13(11):2446. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[7] Khater HM. Effect of nano-silica on microstructure formation of low-cost geopolymer binder. Nanocomposites. 2016 Apr 2;2(2):84-97. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[8] Çevik A, Alzeebaree R, Humur G, Niş A, Gülşan ME. Effect of nano-silica on the chemical durability and mechanical performance of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Ceramics International. 2018 Aug 1;44(11):12253-64. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[9] Ghanei, A., Jafari, F., Khotbehsara, M. M., Mohseni, E., Tang, W., & Cui, H. (2017). Effect of Nano-CuO on engineering and microstructure properties of fibre-reinforced mortars incorporating metakaolin: Experimental and numerical studies. Materials, 10(10), 1215. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[10] Sikandar MA, Jo BW, Baloch Z, Khan MA. Properties of Chemically Synthesized Nano-geopolymer Cement based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete (SCGC). Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed.. 2019 Feb;34(1):98-106. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[11] Ravitheja A, Kumar NK. Effect of Nano-Silica and GGBS on the Strength Properties of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers. InSustainable Construction and Building Materials 2019 (pp. 449-458). Springer, Singapore. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[12] Rashad AM. Effect of nanoparticles on the properties of geopolymer materials. Magazine of Concrete Research. 2019 Dec;71(24):1283-301. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[13] Zhang H, Li L, Yuan C, Wang Q, Sarker PK, Shi X. Deterioration of ambient-cured and heat-cured fly ash geopolymer concrete by high temperature exposure and prediction of its residual compressive strength. Construction and Building Materials. 2020 Nov 30;262:120924. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[14] Naskar S, Chakraborty AK. Effect of nano materials in geopolymer concrete. Perspectives in science. 2016 Sep 1;8:273-5. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[15] Alawais A, West RP. Ultra-violet and chemical treatment of crumb rubber aggregate in a sustainable concrete mix. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance. 2019 Jul 3;4(3):144-52. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[16] Liu F, Meng LY, Chen GX, Li LJ. Dynamic mechanical behaviour of recycled crumb rubber concrete materials subjected to repeated impact. Materials Research Innovations. 2015 Nov 1;19(sup8):S8-496. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[17] Mohammadi Y, Ezzati S. Effect of Nanosilica on The permeability of Self Compacting Concrete in Sulfate Environment. Concrete Research. 2016 Feb 20;8(2):47-60. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[18] Corr D, Shah SP. Concrete materials science at the nanoscale. InApplications of Nanotechnology in Concrete Design: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the University of Dundee, Scotland, UK on 7 July 2005 2005 (pp. 2-12). Thomas Telford Publishing. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[19] Rovnaník P, Šimonová H, Topolář L, Keršner Z. Mechanical fracture properties of alkali-activated slag with graphite filler. Procedia Engineering. 2017 Jan 1;190:43-8. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[20] Badarloo B, Kari A, Jafari F. Experimental and Numerical Study to Determine the Relationship between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete. Civil Engineering Journal. 2018 Nov 30;4(11):2787-800. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[21] Hamidi F, Aslani F, Valizadeh A. Compressive and tensile strength fracture models for heavyweight geopolymer concrete. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2020 May 15;231:107023. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
[22] Gunasekera C, Setunge S, Law DW. Correlations between mechanical properties of low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concretes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 2017 Sep 1;29(9):04017111. [View at Google Scholar] ; [View at Publisher]
Journal of Civil Engineering and Materials Application
Volume 4, Issue 4
December 2020
Pages 243-252

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 07 July 2020
  • Revise Date: 17 September 2020
  • Accept Date: 25 October 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics