3. KHALILI NM, Dabiri R, HAJIALILUE BM. Evaluating the Liquefaction Potential of Soil in the South and Southeast of Tehran based on the Shear Wave Velocity through Empirical Relationships. 2012, 29-41.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
5. Andrus RD, Stokoe II KH. Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering. 2000 Nov;126(11):1015-25.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
7. Uyanık O, Ekinci B, Uyanık NA. Liquefaction analysis from seismic velocities and determination of lagoon limits Kumluca/Antalya example. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2013 Aug 1;95:90-103.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
11. Kayen RE, Mitchell JK. Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 1997 Dec;123(12):1162-74.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
13. Jafarian Y, Vakili R, Abdollahi AS, Baziar MH. Simplified soil liquefaction assessment based on cumulative kinetic energy density: attenuation law and probabilistic analysis. International Journal of Geomechanics. 2014 Apr 1;14(2):267-81.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
14. Kokusho T, Mimori Y. Liquefaction potential evaluations by energy-based method and stress-based method for various ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2015 Aug 1;75:130-46.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
16. Askari F, Dabiri R, Shafiee A, Jafari MK. Effects of non-plastic fines content on cyclic resistance and post liquefaction of sand-silt mixtures based on shear wave velocity.2010, 13-24.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
18. Pyke R, Seed HB, Chan CK. Settlement of sands under multidirectional shaking. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 1975 Apr;101(ASCE# 11251 Proceeding).
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
20.Oshnaviyeh D, Dabiri R. Comparison of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Shear Wave Velocity (Vs) Methods in Determining Liquefaction Hazard along Tabriz Metro Line 2. Journal of Engineering Geology. 2018 Oct 10;12(2):183-212.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
21. Ghasemian M, Dabiri R, Mahari R. Settlements hazard of soil due to liquefaction along Tabriz Metro line 2. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences. 2018 Jun 1;24(6).
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
22. Shimomura S, Adachi T, Asaeda R and Sako N, Study on Applicability of ground settlement prediction method in liquefaction based on energy balance 15th World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, 2012, 1-10.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
23. Iwasaki T. A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan. InProc. Second Int. Conf. Microzonation Safer Construction Research Application, 1978 1978 (Vol. 2, pp. 885-896).
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
24. Iwasaki T, Tokida KI, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H. Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. InProceedings of the 3rd international conference on microzonation, Seattle 1982 Jun 28 (Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1310-1330).
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
25. Barzegari G, Uromeihy A, Zhao J. EPB tunneling challenges in bouldery ground: a new experience on the Tabriz metro line 1, Iran. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2014 May 1;73(2):429-40.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
26. Idriss IM. An update to the Seed-Idriss simplified procedure for evaluating liquefaction potential. Proc., TRB Worshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction, Pubbl. n. FHWA-RD-99-165, Federal Highway Administation. 1999 Jan.
[View at Google Scholar];
[View at Publisher].
27. Skempton A K , Standard Penetration Test Procedures and the Effects in Sands of Overburden Pressure, Relative Density, Particle Size, Aging and over consolidation, Journal of Geotechnique, 1986, 36(3): 425-447.
[View at Google Scholar].